Yanasa TV

Yanasa TV

Sun Valley Orchards v. Department of Labor

What Happens to Administrative Courts After Jarkesy—and Why Farmers Should Pay Attention

Yanasa TV's avatar
Charles Rankin's avatar
Yanasa TV and Charles Rankin
Feb 09, 2026
∙ Paid

Most farmers never expect to find themselves debating constitutional law.

They expect to argue yields, labor availability, weather, prices, and compliance checklists. When regulators show up, the assumption is usually the same: follow the process, answer the questions, fix what needs fixing, and move on.

But Sun Valley Orchards v. Department of Labor is not about compliance in the ordinary sense. It is about who gets to decide guilt and impose punishment when the federal government claims a violation has occurred—and whether that decision can still happen behind closed administrative doors after the Supreme Court’s landmark Jarkesy ruling.

This case doesn’t come with dramatic footage or emotional spectacle. What it comes with instead is something more dangerous to the modern regulatory system: a procedural challenge that threatens to slow, reroute, and expose how enforcement power is actually exercised.

Subscriber-Only Analysis Below

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Yanasa TV.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Charles Rankin · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture